Monday, December 01, 2008

Kathmandu University In need of rejuvenation

R C Sharma

Magnificent buildings to suit the sloping landscape and picturesque and quaint background of the surrounding hills make Kathmandu University a good place to be around. But when it comes to the real essence of a university, the teachers, the students, the teaching-learning activities, motivation, sense of ownership and dedication, there is some sense of frustration with what is happening at the university. Because of its vicinity to the Kathmandu Valley, apolitical academic environment, timely examination schedules and new courses, it was very popular among the students and guardians, as a suitable alternative to the giant but ailing Tribhuvan University. However, it has failed to maintain its credibility and goodwill.

Most of the key academic and management positions are occupied by the relatives of a chosen few, the vice chancellor, the registrar and the former registrar. Even seventeen years after its establishment, the university has not been able to set up a formal and trustworthy University Service Commission for academic and non-academic appointments. Most of the decisions regarding appointments and promotions are taken on the basis of informal discussions and interviews. Those with close ties with the university top management experience steady career growth and reach to the top echelon rapidly while honest, qualified and dedicated faculty members are forced to work at junior positions for peiods that may go up to almost one and half a decade. In comparison, at Tribhuvan University, we find a set of well defined criteria for appointment or promotion of the teaching staff. Academic qualification, teaching-research experience, national and international publications and presentations and teaching efficiency are very important criteria for selection or promotion among the teaching ranks.

KU has paid the least attention to research activities which are a basis for recognition in the world. There should be a cohesive force to bind the faculty, the management and students together and develop a sense of ownership or a sense of belonging towards the university. Contrary to this, the KU management has has not helped in this effort. For a teacher who is not a relative of any of the top university officials, it is almost impossible to build a secure career. He/she may be denied a promotion, study leave or any other facility because the management does not adhere to any fixed set of rules and regulations. Employee satisfaction is low. Inability to retain qualified teachers in the university service has been the biggest failure of the management which has witnessed a fairly high attrition rate in recent years. Many senior teachers have left the university to pursue better careers and the management is forced to run some of the academic departments with the help of teaching assistants only.

Kathmandu University is considered to be a ‘privately managed public university’. This is rather confusing to many. Actually, it is an educational institution enacted by the parliament and it should be answerable to the people regarding its activities. But, the financial status and the income-expenditure statements of the university have almost been kept as tightly guarded secrets, known to only very few officials of the innermost management core. The KU fees for the students are quite high and it also levies hefty affiliation fees on its medical and management colleges. Besides, it receives aid from the government and other national and international organisations. Much of its investment has gone into the construction of buildings and into supporting the school of medicine which is not self-reliant. Very little expenditure is made on laboratories or research works. Moreover, there have been no welfare programmes for teachers or students. All this leads to questioning the lack of financial transparency. Accusations are there against the VC and his coterie of involvement in unhealthy personal financial interests in the never-ending construction and procurement works at the university. The tendency to occupy a position for successive tenures is common in politics but such trends are rarely seen in academic institutions. Taking maximum advantage of his political contacts and the confidence of the handpicked members of the university senate, Dr. Sharma has been able to continue into the fifth term as VC.

The country is entering a new era of political and social restructuring. In this context it is necessary to strengthen and democratise our educational institutions which for a long time have been political playgrounds and instruments of profit for just a few persons. We are lagging behind in development because our universities have simply churned out theoretically educated but uncompetitive and unskilful graduates. Universities should be hubs of research, invention and development, and they should support the national economy. Kathmandu University desperately needs a change of leadership, to become a dynamic and globally competitive university.

Sharma is a former faculty member, KU
Source: THT

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

http://www.thehimalayantimes.com/fullstory.asp?filename=aEUata0scqzpla4Pa9pa.axamal&folder=aEUaiFaoaraiaaal&Name=Editorial&sImageFileName=

LETTERS

Baseless allegations
Apropos of the edit page article “Kathmandu University: In need of rejuvenation” (THT, Nov 19), it seems that the writer has not updated his knowledge of the recent activities and achievements of Kathmandu University (KU). KU has been able to establish itself as a world class university and even been able to educate scores of foreign students. The 14th convocation, which was recently held, awarded diplomas to a total of 1378 students, out of which 25 per cent were foreign students. Regarding the Service Commission, I would like to point out that nowhere in the world, except some Nepali universities, is this system in place. The claim about the absence of research activities also holds no ground as the School of Education and Medical Sciences have published several journals and articles of international standard. PhD students at KU are now required to publish at least two articles in international journals. Moreover, KU has also been listed among the top 100 universities in Asia. And, above all, KU’s contribution to the national economy is considerable. Definitely, under bad leadership KU would not have been able to boast these remarkable achievements.

Faculty members, School of Education, KU

===========================
Daring
===========================
This is in reference to the edit page article “Kathmandu University: In need of rejuvenation” (THT, Nov 20). I along with many of the Kathmandu University (KU) staff would like to thank the author for his daring exposure of the malpractices prevalent in KU. One can remain an
academician as long as one wants to but cannot indefinitely hold onto the position of vice-chancellor, registrar or dean. If the tenure of chief executives is set for an indefinite period, then vices associated with it are inevitable. However, every truth passes through three stages before it is recognised. In the first, it is ridiculed. In the second stage, it is opposed. This was
demonstrated by KU authorities as well. By equating truth with indiscipline, they have harassed, tortured, victimised and even sacked the staff who spoke and took the side of truth. In the third stage, the truth is regarded as self evident, when it requires no further evidence. And this stage, for KU, I think has come.

Dr. Bibhuti Ranjan Jha, via e-mail

Anonymous said...

Who are these bootlicking faculty members of School of Education?

Why are you people trying to compare research activities of faculties and students with the leadership ability of Suresh Raj?

Agreed that 25% are foreign students. But, what about their way of enrollment? Are these foreign students enrolled in KU's own colleges or affiliated colleges? Just to inflate the figure, these bootlickers are counting Medical students also who pay hefty capitation fee to get education in affiliated colleges.

The leadership of Suresh Raj has nothing to do with those affiliated colleges. Becuase of that there is no protest against Suresh Raj from Manipal and other colleges. They maintain a distance with Suresh Raj and never allow to call him shots there. They have their own mechanism to survive.

But, everywhere else, Suresh Raj is facing a great deal of challenge. He is constantly berated for his failures as a real academic. He is being criticized for compromising the quality of education. He is being taken to task for giving affiliation without assessing qualities of medical institutions. To top it all, it is much criticized that he allows question papers to be set by respective medical schools. If Suresh Raj is really confident of quality, why not he allow others to prepare the question papers. The examination system in Medical colleges are another venue of corruption.

Do we need to tell how the examinations are conducted by handpicked examiners of Bhadra Man, Pushpa Raj and Sitaram?

As regards. research papers, I find some blogs posted here more insightful than those published by certain deans and medical professors. I read one publication by one dean Chapagain in Proceedings of Engineers Association of Nepal. I did not see any references and citations. He talked big about quality and management. Does it make any sense without citations? This shows the quality of research papers published by Suresh Raj supporters.

Arbinda

Anonymous said...

Dear faculties of School of Education,

Have you ever updated your consciece? How can you consider that murderer of Dalits as an example of good leadership?

Now , what about his own daughter?

I heard that she died because of high blood pressure as she was made incharge of propaganda department.

Can a father ever neglect such a vulnerable time like pregnancy and overburden his own daughter?

Suresh Raj is not a good manager, he is a devil inside a human body.

Priya