Showing posts with label English. Show all posts
Showing posts with label English. Show all posts

Friday, July 10, 2009

KU shut down for 25 days

Kantipur Report
DHULIKHEL, July 10 - The Kathmandu University (KU) in Dhulikhel has been closed down for 25 days from Friday. Citing the disruption of academics and regular administrative work due to the obstruction by the locals of Dhulikhel where the university is located, the KU administration today decided to close down the university for 25 days. Bakhundol locals at Dhulikhel Municipality-7 of Kavre district have been blocking the roadway to the KU to press the university administration to fulfill their demands like employment for locals, scholarship for their children and allowing locals to run the university cafeteria.

Also, the university was compelled to postpone the regular examinations of different faculties due to the obstruction.
Source: E-Kantipur


Read more!

Wednesday, March 25, 2009

Prachanda and KU drinking episode

Since yesterday, Nepal’s media have become busy reporting on “KU drinking episode” in which the son of PM Prachanda was caught dozing off after a binge drinking in camera. No sooner than Mr. Prakash Dahal issued denial through FACEBOOK‘फेसबुक’ बाट प्रकाश दाहालको स्पष्टिकरण, another vernacular Nepali weekly JanaAstha carried a feature report प्रमपुत्रले रक्सी पिउँदा हामीलाई पेलान clearly indicating roles of Prof. Suresh Raj Sharma and Dr. Ram Kantha Shrestha. Similarly enepalnews.com has प्रधानमन्त्री पुत्रको रक्सी प्रकरण सम्वन्धमा थप समाचार carried both the JanaAstha Weekly report as well as Facebook denial of Mr. Prakash Dahal.

(1) Present discussion in Media:
As reported in www.weeklynepal.com by Moti Ram Timsina, intially both Suresh Raj Sharma and Ram Kantha Shrestha tried to prevent entry of the journalists in the “binge drinking academic meeting of KU.” When the journalists persisted to stay in Dhulikhel Lodge resort, Ram Kantha Shrestha, asked his hotel owner brother Mr. Prem Kantha to “entertain” the journalists. From this report, it is clearly established that Suresh Raj Sharma of Kathmandu University has been wasting hard-earned cash as well as financial assistance of international donors in wining and dining. Especially, in this recession hit time, it is extremely detestable to know that a Vice-Chancellor of an impoverished nation goes out of his way to finance a binge party.

In political circle, this episode has turned into a god-send opportunity for opposition Nepali Congress. Not taking a chance, pro-congress vernacular “Ghatana ra Bichar” has reported प्रकाशको ‘क्रान्तिकारी ढलान’ that overspeeding Mr. Prakash Dahal nearly killed some scribes before proceeding to the binge party organized by Suresh Raj Sharma. The way the report was presented, it appears that the pro-congress newspaper is now hell-bent in projecting Mr. Prakash Dahal as a neo-Parash. Then crown-prince Parash has remained extremely unpopular in Nepal because of some fatal hit-and-run accidents attributed to him. Political pundits believe that this story could have been planted at the behest of over-ambitious daughter of Congress leader G.P. Koirala. She has been sulking for a long time against the Maoists leaning newspaper for reporting on her personal relations with many Congress leaders. So, it is probable that she might have been revenging by instigating her supporters in the media to present Mr. Prakash Dahal negatively in public eye.

On the other hand, general public has started to show their disgust against the Maoists. In the popular Nepali blog MySansar प्रधानमन्त्रीपुत्रलाई कसले कारबाही गर्ने ?, around 300 comments have been received. A kind of war of words is now taking place between pro-Maoists and anti-Maoists. Some serious voices, claiming to be those of Maoists supporters, have bitterly lamented that the Maoists have ultimately turned out to be no different from other political outfits. There are some voices demanding action against Mr. Prakash Dahal also. They opine that if the Maoist party can suspend a CA member for not attending an important CA meeting under the influence of alcohol, why not Mr. Prakash Dahal be also taken action against?

2) Is it a political sabotage?
Looking back at the chronological events, it appears that there are some political conspiracy involved in this episode. Moreover, involvement of both Suresh Raj Sharma and Ram Kantha Shrestha, clearly indicate this. Suresh Raj Sharma has remained loyal to Royal Palace throughout his life. He became Professor of Tribhuvan University through the royal decree without facing any interview/test in Tribhuvan University. His academic credentials show that he does not deserve to be a professor. For making him professor, he has always remained loyal to the Royal palace. With his supporters, even today, he openly talks about possibility reinstitution of Monarchy in Nepal. On the other hand, Dr. Ram Kantha Shrestha is politically motivated younger brother of Mayor Bell Prasad Shrestha. When King Gyanendra took full control, Mr. Bell Prasad Shrestha was quite powerful and got nomiated as Mayor of Dhulikhel Municipality.

Besides these political pasts, Suresh Raj Sharma has recently started to grumble against the Maoist government. After his crackdown on KUPA and KUSA in KU, and harassment triggered death of Mr. Buddhi Bahadur Biswokarma, many eyebrows were raised against Suresh Raj Sharma regime in KU. Some prominent left leaning intellectuals have openly called for ouster of Suresh Raj Sharma from KU. Sensing his possible removal, Suresh Raj Sharma has been recently spotted in a number of closed door meetings with Mr. Radheshyam Adhikary, Nepali Congress C.A. member and another confident of Sujata Koirala.

If one combines Suresh Raj’s political past, present association and fear of his removal, it is not difficult to see that Suresh Raj has once again availed his services to defame the Maoists. The number of reasons why Suresh Raj did it are as follows;

(i) Had Suresh Raj had no intention to defame Prachanda and his family, he would have organzied the meeting between Chancellor Prime-Minister Prachanda and himself within KU premise. Many, who have been to KU, knows very well that there are venues within KU premise as well as in Dhulikhel Hospital to hold meetings and discussion.

(ii) It is normal that visiting dignitaries are provided basic snacks/lunch/dinner. There are many occasions when lunch or dinner have been ordered to arrange in KU premise itself. So, Had Suresh Raj wanted, he could have arranged the dinner party within KU premise. This would have prevented both the entry of the journalists/reporters as well as free-flow of alcohol. And this would have saved Prime-minister Prachanda and his family from the present embarassment.

(iii) Suresh Raj organized binge party in Dhulikhel Lodge resort with clear intention of exposing the Maoists. His hesitation to answer the jounalists on presence of the Prime-minister was a cover up to shroud his own mobilization of the journalists. It is highly likely that his younger brother Mr. Mukunda Prasad Upadhyay might have tipped off the journalists about possible sensational news in Dhulikhel Lodge resort.


3) Academic Morality:
Many Nepalese have discussed about this issue from pro and anti-Maoists viewpoints. Mainly those, who suffered during the people’s war because of total prohibition exercised by the Maoists, are now baying for the blood of Prakash Dahal. In this vengeful pursuits, none has bothered to ask about how come a University meeting take place amidst a heavy drinking binge party?

There are many universities in South Asia where drinking is total no-no inside University premise. Mainly the universities, schools and colleges in India and Nepal are considered temple of learning or temple of goddess Sarswoti. So, many Principals, Vice-Chancellors and Directors refrain from spending institution’s money for binge party. Neither they alllow alcohol inside university nor they ever spend a single penny on alcohol. It is a generally accepted norm that most of the parties thrown by presiding officers should be without alcohol.

However, in case of Kathmandu University, all rules are broken at the whims and fancies of Prof. Suresh Raj Sharma. Though he generally complains of blood-pressure, yet he generally visits Dhulikhel lodge resort to satiate his thirst for alcohol. One would have never complained, had he paid his own bill. Even for his personal binge drinking, the bill is footed by KU. Regular gathering, in Dhulikhel Lodge Resort, of Suresh Raj Sharma, Sitaram Adhikary, Bhadraman Tuladhar, Pushpa Raj Tuladhar, Bhola Thapa, Brijesh Adhikary and their family members have been noticed by many teachers and students of KU. And we have been consistently reporting that most of the decisions taken by Suresh Raj to crush the voices of academic freedom, KUPA, and KUSA emanated from Dhulikhel Lodge resort.

It is highly lamentable that a large sum of money is lost by KU in organizing binge drinking party for Suresh Raj Sharma. There are many meritorious students leaving the campus because of financial constrait. Many parents have been working hard in the belief that the money they pay to KU will be used for both betterment of education and shaping up the future of their wards. There is a great scarcity of good teachers because of low pay-scale in Kathmandu University. Had Suresh Raj been somewhat more thoughtful, he would have cut down on his binge parties and arranged to pay for either tuition fees of the students or for remuneration of the teachers. But, he has never done it. He has consistently used Dhulikhel Lodge resort to arrange binge parties such that it has now started to trigger another suspicion, whether Suresh Raj is involved in a corrupt dealing over there also?

Now the time has come for every one, students, teachers, staffs, and international donors to recognize that KU has financial constraint not because of less payment of tuition fee. Students need to protest on the lowering the tuition fee and the teachers and staffs need to inform Suresh Raj that the money he generally spends in organizing binge parties should be provided to them. Similarly, international donors must question Suresh Raj on how transparently he is spending money in KU.

4) Conclusions:
a) This episode clearly establishes our charges that Suresh Raj is ingratiating himself by wining and dining powerful personalities of Nepal.
b) It is quite likely that Suresh Raj Sharma must be hand in glove with Radheshyam Adhikary, Sujata Koirala and G. P. Koirala. Given present animosity between Rukmangat Katwal, who even dispatched his army band to KU to show solidarity with Suresh Raj, and Prachanda, Royalits of all ilks could have come together to defame Prachanda and his family.
c) Suresh Raj Sharma is berefet of any morality. He uses money paid by the students on wining and dining.
d) The Maoists, mainly PM Prachanda, must take cognizance of the fact that had Suresh Raj Sharma and Ram Kanth Shrestha organized the meeting either within KU premise or Dhulikhel Hospital, this embarassment could have been averted.
e) PM and Chancellor Prachanda must take note of the fact that one dean and relative of Prof. Suresh Raj Sharma, Dr. Mana Prasad Wagley has openly accused him of playing a dubious role. No sitting dean has ever accused of a Chancellor of playing politics. Dr. Mana Prasad Wagley had done so at the behest of Prof. Suresh Raj Sharma and therefore, it is more than enough to establish malafide intention of Prof. Suresh Raj Sharma in organizing this meeting in Dhulikhel Lodge resort.
f) Series of incidents, wherein Suresh Raj Sharma is involved in defaming the Maoists and Prachanda, demand that PM and Chancellor Prachanda must immidiately sack Suresh Raj Sharma, Sitaram Adhikary, Bhadraman Tuladhar, Pushpa Raj Adhikary and constitute a probe committee.


Read more!

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

Suresh Raj's new scandal

When we talked about Dhulikhel Lodge Resort as an entertainment hub of Suresh Raj, no body believed us. Many claimed that we are badmouthing a very good educationist. Suresh Raj has never hesitated to use hard-earned money to spend on whisky, wine and women. He has entertained a great deal of leaders, ministers, ministers' wives, ministers' sons and daughters at Dhulikhel Lodge resort. But, this time he has moved one step further to entertain Prime-minister Prachanda himself.

Whatever expectation we had of the Maoists are dwindling very fast. The Maoists have also proved that they are no different from other politicians. Prime-ministers, be it Girija or Surya Bahadur or Sher Bahadur or Prachanda, have always like Suresh Raj. But, unlike others, in case of Prachanda, it appears that Prime-minister Prachanda's son Prakash seems to have liked Suresh Raj very much.

Recent media reports (My Sansar,Samacharpatra) which show Mr. Prakash sleeping after consuming alcohol, clearly indict Suresh Raj Sharma. By organizing such party, Suresh Raj has been cajoling many politicians and their family members. The hard-earned money of KU is being used for saving his chair only. Though it is painful to the Maoists, yet it is very good that Suresh Raj's name has once again surfaced in a scandal. Prime-minister Prachanda, need to be aware of the fact that Suresh Raj must have organized this party to defame his government and his family.

Furthermore, this blogger views that recent incident involving Mr. Prakash is a direct result of the Maoists' indicision. Instead of immidiately sacking corrupt, nepotist, communal, racist and casteist elements like Suresh Raj Sharma, the Maoists have also started to maintain status quo. As a result, the Maoists are getting trapped by the influences of the elements of status quo and started wining and womanising. If the Maoists continue to ignore righteous voices and refrain from sacking elements like Suresh Raj, then days are not far away when they will be pushed to the fringes of politics. Hope the Maoists would learn from Prakash episode and identify how dangerous the shadow of Suresh Raj is.


Read more!

Friday, January 09, 2009

Ghajini of KU



Recent watching of Aamir Khan starrer Ghajini in Gopi Krishna was worth my money. It was a thrilling movie I had watched in almost a decade. Moreover, it revealed how one single incident brings in cataclysmic changes in someone's life. Kalpana would have never died had she not tried to save those young girls. She would have been pleasantly surprised that the Sachin she was dating was actually the Sanjaya Singhania. But, in between came traffickers of human organs, human traffickers and finally came the Mafia Ghajani. A goody-goody comical and romantic fare turned into a revenge story only because of the Mafia. 

The Ghajani is a perfect Mafia in that he was quite capable of maintaining societal reputation by extending huge donations as Ghajani Dharmatma. But, behind this facade of social philantrophy lies his hidden trade of organs and flesh. And to conceal his real traits and trades, he not only kills those innocent girls but also the beautiful Asin. 

When I look back into KU and start thinking of the role of Suresh Raj Sharma, there comes only one question to my mind. Why do the murderers and mafias have similar streaks? 

Suresh Raj Sharma of KU claims that he is also a Sadhu because he has presided over setting up of KU. Through newspaper articles, he tries to praise himself and he becomes much obliged when manipulators like Dr. Jaya Raj Acharya and Karna Shakya praise him. But, inside he remains a pure nepotist who has not hesitated to kill the essence of academia. When the faculties and staffs oppose him openly, he becomes more dangerous and starts using goons like Bhola Thapa to harass one hapless Dalit employee to death. Aamir Khan's Gajani has traded in human organs and humans themselves. Suresh Raj has traded in academic values at the expense of academicians and academic staffs. For sheer benefit, Suresh Raj has also done similar things Ghajani has done. 

Aamir Khan has nothing to do with Gajani's business. He was involved in it because he was restless to meet his fiance. Similarly, Buddhi Bahadur was never concerned with Suresh Raj's business. He never uttered a single word when Suresh Raj appointed Mukunda as Chief Administrative Staff. Nor he ever spoke against continuation of Brijesh, Manish, Daniel and Sharad as KU teachers and managers. But, he was attacked when he went to receive his cherished rights. And with this attack there comes the short term memory loss for so called intellectuals of KU. 

Aamir Khan starred Ghajani unfailingly depicts that for no mistake of ours, the mafias and the murderers inflicts us with short term memory loss. It also depicts that if determined, a person with 14 minutes 52 seconds long memory can also take on a cruel criminal. I believe that there are many professors and professionals who are associated with KU at one point in their lives. Can they remain in a state of memory loss for ever? Should not they take on the Ghajani of KU and dislodge him? I hope that many who detest nepotism, corruption and high-handedness of Suresh Raj Sharma would raise their voice to finish off this Ghajani for ever. 


Read more!

Wednesday, December 24, 2008

Himal Media Episode-2

The Himal Media episode has taken a political turn. It appears that this episode is being blown out of proportion to defame the Prachanda led coalition government of Nepal. Though Nepalese media is full of news reports expressing solidarity with Himal Media, yet there are voices which try to present the issue in a different perspective. Mainly for ordinary Nepalese, I believe that, listening to these voices will be better instead of running to conclusion hurriedly. Moreover, we have also felt, how disgustingly management of so called private sector can attack, humiliate and cause deaths of hapless workers. 

Some of the views clearly indicate that the Management of Himal Media acted in a way similar to what Suresh Raj Sharma has been doing. Suresh Raj Sharma of KU has completely forbidden organizational rights of employees of KU. His management has never recognized formation of KUPA and KUSA. At the same time, he has helped create other entity like "Teacher's welfare council" in KU. This double standard on the part of Suresh Raj and his management has exposed his hollow claim of the employees not having right to organization. Had it been so, Suresh Raj would have never allowed "Teacher's welfare council" in KU. "Teacher's welfare council" is recognized though it was created hurriedly after most of the teachers started getting membership of KUPA in KU. This simply shows that Management of so called private sector in Nepal wants to prevent or suppress genuine demands of employees. 

Please read some pertinent viewpoints on present Himal Media episode below;

Save Nepal media campaign
mediaworkeralliance@gmail.com

Be aware of these two “media captains”

Himalmedia
Himalmedia, established in 1998, has five founders; Ambika Shrestha chairperson and Kanak Mani Dixit, Kunda Dixit, Rajiv Raj Bhandari and Sajib Raj Bhandari directors. The three publications of Himalmedia – Himal Khabarpatrika, Nepali Times and Wave — are being published under the involvement and direction of Kunda Dixit and Kanak Mani Dixit, who are brothers by blood relation and journalists by profession.

While Kanak is the publisher and editor of Himal Khabarpatrika, Kunda is the publisher and editor of Nepali Times and Wave. Himal Khabarpatrika covers politics, economic sector and other areas, Nepali Times is targeted diplomatic crop and Wave covers youth and entertainment.
Besides serving public, all the three publications are being published to aid their own other businesses and are making good profits alone from advertisement with Rs 50 million standing profit every year.

However, the expense is only around Rs 30 million. High prices of the three newspapers have also been significantly contributing to the company. Listed as “Number 1″ three years ago, Himal Khabarpatrika is ranked at Number 2 on circulation basis and Number 3 on news content’s basis. But the Dixit brothers, on the pretext of incurring losses, have been collecting grants from several donor organizations.

On various occasions and pretexts, they have also been collecting around Rs 10 million from the government. Similarly, threatening businessmen of publishing negative news, some Rs 50 million have been amassed. On the other hand, some businessmen provide advertisement on the condition of not publishing their news.

The Dixit brothers are active being wolf in sheep’s clothing, but the other partners stay mum.
The list of their malpractice continues. They also gain various benefits from I/NGOs on the banner of Himalmedia.


The Dixit brothers, who also claim themselves the leaders of civil society, have sowed a seed of dispute between Dr. Devendra Raj Pandey and Krishna Pahadi. It is due to their ill act, Pandey has to cut off relation with Pahadi.
Himal South Asia has also become a breeding ground for them to launch sordid acts of gaining advantage illegally.

Himalmedia at present:


Ever since the inception of the company, employees have been working permanently at Himalmedia. However, suddenly Dixit brothers introduced new system and made staffers work on contract. This gave them a ground to treat workers as servants and lead a life of landlords. On numerous occasions, they sacked workers and hired new ones.

Without serving their interest, no worker could be their employee. Evident is the case of editors. No editor was employed for more than a year. However, Rajendra Dahal’s case was exceptional. This is because Dahal was their family brother-in-law, so he was able to work for more than a year.
Time-bound salary and facility were a far cry for workers. Those staffers, recruited on 5000-7000 salary per month five years ago are still drawing the same scale. Repeated pleas of workers to hike salary and facility fell on the Dixit brothers’ deaf ears. In this way, fours years went down the drain.
Irked workers, hoping for bright fate, established a non-political union for their welfare. However, the Dixit brothers shattered their dreams when they refused to meet them recently after the union was established. The workers got a shot in the arms after Ashutosh Tiwari, who was later nominated as the Chief Executive Officer, pledged to fulfill their genuine demands. He assured to act on the commitment with in a month.

However, even though a year passed, the demands were gathering dust. Worst, the Dixit brothers did not even hand over the permanent letters to working journalists and other staffs. This proves that the Dixit brothers always cultivate false promises.


———–घटनाको बास्‍तबिकता——(Reality of the incident)——–
(English translation is informally done by me)
1)हिमाल मिडियामा कार्यरत कर्मचारी/मजदुरहरूले गत भदौ १७ गते अखिल नेपाल छापाखाना तथा प्रकाशन मजदुर सङ्घको इकाई गठन गरेपछि विवाद सुरु भएको थियो ।
1) Dispute started once the workers in Himal Media formed All Nepal Printing and Publishing Labour Union on September 2, 2008. 

2)मजदुरहरूले अधिकारका लागि सङ्गठित हुनेबित्तिकै हिमाल मिडियाले कम्पनी घाटामा गएको भन्दै कर्मचारी कटौतीको निर्णय गरी सङ्गठनमा आबद्ध १६ जना मजदुरलाई निष्काशन गरेको थियो ।
2) After formation of the Labour Union, the Himal Media sacked 17 workers affiliated with newly formed union on the pretext of finanacial losses of the company.

3)सङ्गठनमा आबद्ध भएकै कारण इकाईका अध्यक्ष दीपक सङ्ग्रौला र अर्का कर्मचारी आशिष खड्कालाई हिमाल मिडियाले कात्तिक २७ गते एक सूचनाका भरमा निष्काशन गर्ने प्रयास गरेको थियो ।
3) Because of association with newly formed union, the Himal Media tried to fire Dipak Sangroula and Aashish Khadka on filmsy ground on November 12, 2008.  

4)दुवैजनालाई सरुवा गर्न नपाइने व्योहोराको पत्र श्रम कार्यालयले कात्तिक २४ गते हिमाल मिडियामा पठाएको ३ दिन नबित्दै मजदुरहरूलाई निष्काशनको प्रयास गरिएको थियो । टे्रड युनियन गठन गरेपछि कम्पनी घाटामा गएको बहाना बनाउँदै कम्पनीका कर्मचारी कटौतीको लागि अनुमति माग्दै प्रेस रजिष्ट्रारकहाँ निवेदन दिएको जनाइए पनि निवेदनविपरीत बजार शाखामा नयाँ कर्मचारी भर्ना गर्न विज्ञापन गरिएको थियो ।
4) The Himal Media tried to fire these two employees despite having received a prior notification of Labour department 3 days before. Though the Himal Media claims to have applied for permission to sack employees in the office of Press Registart on the ground of financial losses, yet it has published new vacancies for Marketing Department.

5)उद्योगधन्दा र व्यवसायका रूपमा सञ्चालन गरिएका निजी सञ्चारमाध्यमहरूमा कर्मचारीहरूले कानुनसम्मत न्यूनतम सेवा सुविधा माग गर्नासाथ प्रेस स्वतन्त्रतामाथि नै हस्तक्षेप भएको गलत हौवा पिटेर प्रेसको शक्तिको दुरुपयोग गर्नसमेत मिडिया पछि नपरेको तथ्य कान्तिपुर, आप्का हाउस, समाचारपत्र, इसीआर एफएम, एचबीसी एफएमलगायतका सञ्चारमाध्यममा भएको आन्दोलनले सावित गरिसकेका छन्।
5) Private Media has never hesitated to misuse of the power of press to make a hue and cry about "Freedom of expression" whenever employees demanded minimum benefits they are legally entitled to. Various agitations in Kantipur, Apca House, SamacharPatra, ECR FM, HBC FM clearly indicate this.

6)मजदुरहरूको सङ्गठित हुने र सामूहिक सौदाबाजी गर्ने श्रम ऐन २०४८ प्रदत्त अधिकार साथै श्रमजीवी पत्रकार ऐन पहिलो संशोधन २०६४ को दफा ३४ क मा उल्लेखित पत्रकार मजदुरहरूको टे्रड युनियन अधिकारलाई नेपालका सञ्चारमाध्यमका व्यवस्थापनले कुण्ठित गर्ने प्रयासलाई संस्थागत गर्न खोज्दा बेलाबेलामा प्रतिष्ठित भनिएका सञ्चारमाध्यमहरू विवाद र बद्नाम हुँदै आएका छन् ।
6) So called reputed media houses have come into controversy whenever they tried to institutionalize suppression of organizational rights as envisaged in acts of 2048 and 2064. 

7) छलफल चलिरहेको बेला व्यवस्थापन पक्षले पहिले नै बोलाएर राखेका युवाहरूले एकजना मजदुर प्रतिनिधिलाई ‘जहिले पनि माओवादीकै माग पूरा गर्नुपर्ने, गरिन्न के गर्छौ गर’ भन्दै हातपात गरेका थिए । हिमाल खबर पत्रिकाको व्यवस्थापनले वार्ता गर्न बोलाएका आफ्ना मजदुरहरूमाथि उल्टै गुन्डाहरू बोलाएर आक्रमण गरेको दाबी । ‘वार्ता गर्न बोलाएर मजदुरहरू त्यहाँ गएका थिए । तर, एक्कासि गुन्डाहरू लगाएर मजदुरहरूमाथि आक्रमण गरियो–’हिमाल मिडियाले वर्षौंदेखि काम गरिरहेका स्थायी कर्मचारीहरू विनाकारण निकाल्दा चुप लाग्ने दलहरूले मजदुरहरूको पक्षमा कुरा उठ्दा माओवादीले आक्रमण गर्‍यो भनेर आरोप लगाउनु कहाँको जायज कुरा हो,??????
7) During negotiation, some youths deployed by the Management tried to manhandle representatives of employees. Employees claim that Himal Media tried to take help of goons to attack employees. And they further state that the political parties, who remained mute when employees were expelled on baseless grounds, have no right to accuse the Maoists for involvement. 


Read more!

Sunday, December 21, 2008

Suresh Raj supporter Ashutosh Tiwari attacked



When I heard that Ashutosh Tiwari, CEO, of Himal Media was attacked, I immidiately sensed that inevitable has happened. But, the problem is that for this attack also the Maoists are being blamed. It is true that general people, mainly the ones who have been exploited and abused so far, have become aggressive with ascendancy of the Maoists in Nepal. Employees, teachers, and many other have been subject to exploitation in Nepal. Rampant termination, caste harassment and persecution of the voices against nepotism and corruption had become an order of the day. When ordinary people go to administration, the administration never take action. And when they raise their voices in public forums, people like Ashutosh Tiwari, advise that "Take the complaints to the KU governing board, and NOT to the newspapers at this point. The results of washing the dirty laundry in public have NEVER been favorable to the plaintiffs in Nepal (in my limited observations!). Nepali newspapers print so many bad things about so many people all the time that nobody believes them for anything any more except read the stuff for juicy gossip for a day or two."

Given recent spate of media reports and uproar in Constituent Assembly of Nepal, it is likely that some untoward incident might have taken place in Himal Media. But, it is very difficult to believe what Himal Media is saying. In the past, we have bitter experience with Himal Media as it biasedly favoured Suresh Raj Sharma without listening to the voices of the agitating teachers and staffs. Please refer to our previous post Suresh Raj's new gimmick and read what KUPA GS Dr. Sameer Dixit has commented.

Himal Media claims that the Maoists attacked them because of their Feature report in vernacular weekly "Himal." At the same time, it is an open secret that the Himal Media is terminating jobs also. So, a neutral Nepali, who do not have to earn livelihood by writing in Newspapers, find it very difficult to ascertain who is right and who is wrong. It is quite possible that the Management itself might have carried out this kind of attack to hurry closure of the office to give permanency to the job termination. 

Borrowing the words of Ashutosh Tiwari, I like to suggest him and Himal Media to take the complaints to Press council, Police and even to supreme court. In my limited observations, washing the dirty underwear in public have never been favorable to the plaintiffs. Nepali newspapers print so many bad things that people are considering recent uproar in CA against attack on Himal Media also as a ploy of G.P. Koirala to defame the Maoist government led by Prachanda. Girija many become happy as he has some juicy gossip to discredit the Maoists. But, others will forget this story after a couple of days. 


Read more!

Thursday, December 18, 2008

Arrogance has to go

This refers to the edit page article KU needs change, more than ever (THT, Dec. 17). Kathmandu University (KU) was established with the vision of providing Nepali students with a disciplined academic institution. Scheduled and fair examinations, hiring competent faculties and staff and eliminating nepotism, favouritism and corruption were the main things that led to the founding of KU.

Almost two decades on, however, KU is mired in controversy, which is mostly to be attributed to the evils fostered by its current VC Prof. Suresh Raj Sharma. The weakest aspect of his administration lies not only in his promotion of the practice of nepotism but also in his penchant for coming down heavily on dissenters. Added to it is the adoption of highly undesirable methods to suppress agitating teachers.

The VC and his cronies claim that unions lead to politicisation of the university. This cannot be refuted. But at KU, we need teachers’ union to bring an end to the VC’s dictatorship. For instance, Sharma generally selects teachers’ representative in the “Executive Council” from amongst his relatives and sycophants. If it is mandatory to have a teachers’ representative in the “Executive Council”, why not allow this selection to be made through consultations with the teachers. To serve that cause, the importance of a non-political professional body like KUPA is beyond dispute.

S B Shrestha,
former Asst. Professor,
Mechanical Engineering, KU


Read more!

Wednesday, December 17, 2008

KU needs change, more than ever



Sameer M Dixit

Kathmandu University (KU) was established some 17 years ago, at a time when absolute monarchy gave way to constitutional monarchy. The end of the Panchayati era meant the country was looking forward to new ideas and vision. Upholding the spirit for change, Valley Campus transformed into Kathmandu University. The unified strength of the teachers, administration and the students made KU a respected institution within a very short time. Since its establishment, KU has gone from having barely 10-15 employees to over 250 in recent years. This has brought about massive administrative and policy changes within the structure of this institution. Unfortunately, with success comes power, and with power, sometimes, autocracy. The leadership of Kathmandu University too fell into this trap, albeit in some ways innocently to start with, but enjoying it more with time. This has meant that the academic freedom within the boundaries of this institution has been curtailed on the pretext of academic excellence and efficiency.

There has been a steep decline in the number of students pursuing PhD. The KU medical school is focusing on quantity rather than quality. Very recently, a Master’s level programme run by KU at Manipal College was disqualified by the Indian Medical Council. In its management schools, KU has not been able to retain good faculty. In the School of Engineering, fresh graduates are employed as teachers. The School of Arts and School of Education are simply too small to have any significant impact, but have KU leadership’s relatives and cronies in decision making roles. To top this, the current Vice Chancellor of KU has not been able to call even one single general meeting, of all staff and teachers in the last three years.

The School of Science is the most successful, and ironically, is also the school which has voiced concern against the leadership’s highhandedness, non-transparency as well as deteriorating quality of education at KU.

Kathmandu University Professors Association (KUPA) was formed to ensure that academics at KU could play a constructive role in the development of KU. It was formed to support the administration, as is the case in most universities of Nepal. KUPA consists of senior academicians, teachers of long standing, young foreign-returned academics, and most importantly, those who want to create a proactive working environment at KU. KU now needs change, more than ever. Change in thinking, change in communication, change in activity and change in leadership. KU cannot go ahead basking in its past glory: it needs to look to the future. It cannot keep comparing itself to other less developed universities in Nepal: those universities either cater to the actual population of this developing country, or are relatively new themselves (and not necessarily worse as compared to KU). KUPA is vocal about its concerns, and it has earned the wrath of the university leadership. The present state of affairs does not augur well for Kathmandu University.
Source:KU needs change, more than ever


Read more!

Is Man Prasad a mad sychophant?

There is a limit to sychophancy. Why Man Prasad is writing on behalf of Suresh Raj? We all know that Suresh Raj can pen articles very well. He is quite capable of urging people to consider him as a "saint." Prof. Surendra K.C. of TU even "congratulated" Suresh Raj for this. But, you see, Man Prasad is hyperactive now defending Suresh Raj and his nepotistic-corrupt regime in KU. He thinks that KU should be given full autonomy without governmental intervention. This means Suresh Raj wants to kill many other staffs and destroy the lives of many other faculties. Please have a look at the article of the sychophant. And, of course, find letters tom-toming his thesis. 

Higher education : Prachanda’s perspective and realities
Mana Prasad Wagley
The vision of the head of the government plays the most significant role in the development of the education sector. Prime Minister Prachanda, for the first time, has expressed his views about the need to bring reformation in the education sector. He opened up his ideas not in front of his cadres but at a gathering of eminent academicians, prominent political leaders, representatives of the international community and the media.

During the 14th Convocation of Kathmandu University, where former president of India Dr. Abdul Kalam and the president of Mahidol University Thailand presided as chief guests, PM Prachanda appraised Thailand’s educational reforms and added that it should inspire KU in transforming itself as an institution of values and competency not only at the national but also at the regional and multi-regional level. He also valued the message given by Abdul Kalam and praised him for being “the source of inspiration for developing university education with value and wisdom”. If Prachanda is really impressed by the message and is committed to the value and wisdom of university education we can hope that he would be the first to contribute to the noble cause of improving the quality of higher education in Nepal.

Unfortunately, the sister organisation of his own party, ANNFSU (R), demanding representation in the University senate has been obstructing it from holding the meeting. Can the Prime Minister control such undesirable activities that have ‘de-systematised’ the entire educational system? Can he take the progressive step of depoliticising Nepali higher education by promoting value and wisdom more than anything else? Notably, the Prime Minister also praised the chief guests for their guidance in striving to achieve multi-dimensional effectiveness of educational governance with cultural, managerial and professional transformation. The prime minister deserves appreciation for expressing his commitment to the much-needed educational reforms.

The only concern is whether he will have enough time to reflect on his commitments. He outlined the need for universities “to emphasise that it is much an institution that builds on wisdom, and explores and experiments with knowledge.”

In addition, the PM also elaborated on “knowledge economy” and the significant role a university plays in bringing about social transformation.
This is not possible as long as the practice of appointing political cadres as university heads continues. Appointments at Tribhuvan University, PU, PoU, NSU, BPKIHS, NAMS and LBU are made on much the same lines. How can we ever imagine inculcating values and wisdom in our educational system as long as such practices take precedence over merit?

He has also said that educational institutions should not be commercially motivated. However, Finance Minister Baburam Bhattarai has encouraged commercialisation of schools by levying a tax of 5 per cent. One wonders whether the Prime Minister and the finance minister, who coincidentally belong to the same party, do not belong to the same school of thought. The Prime Minister, however, extolled Kathmandu University for setting a high benchmark of the quality of higher education in Nepal.

Definitely, if Prachanda, who is also the Chancellor of other universities in the country, keeps his commitments on improving the quality of education, we can expect our educational establishments to undergo massive transformation.

For this, the government needs to understand the key to KU’s enviable success. The value system of the university has been the biggest contributing factor in this regard. The government itself should support the version of the Prime Minister and help KU and other universities focus on quality education. For this, all universities, including KU, should be given full autonomy and kept away from unnecessary interventions (including party politics) from outside. The Prime Minister has also judged KU’s role in areas of research, which is guided by its visionary professional team.

Urging other institutions to follow in the footsteps of KU, the Prime Minister said, “the institution has been moving forward with the cultivation of culture of decency, service orientation, self-esteem, value-based education and the culture of competition”. The support that KU has received should also be extended to other universities, so that they do not serve merely as the breeding ground of politics.

Judging by the tenor of Prime Minister’s seriousness, the PM expects universities to focus on education more than anything else. However, the maximum politicisation in academic institutes will not let PM’s dreams come true. So the academia, civil society and the media should all come together to persuade the government and political parties to commit to a common education policy.
Dr Wagley is associated with KU

***************
Letters
***************
KU brand of elitist politics
December 09, 2008, The Himalayan Times

Apropos of the edit page article “Higher education: Prachanda’s perspective and realities” (THT, Dec 8), I take exception to writer Dr Mana Prasad Wagley nit-picking the Maoist policy towards higher education in Nepal and, in particular, to private leadership for “international quality” education at Kathmandu University.

Central to his argument is his thesis that inclusion of “politics” such as the demand for the Maoist supported students’ representation in Kathmandu University (KU) Senate is counterproductive to the politics-less value system that has led to KU’s enviable success. But, Professor Wagley in saying so is actually advocating a brand of elitist politics, where decisions are made by the elite and self-professed ‘visionary’ leaders such as the KU Vice Chancellor (VC), the writer himself who is the dean, PM Prachanda and Finance Minister Dr Baburam Bhattarai. Granted this was the only option when educated and politically conscious citizenry, including students, were negligible in number. But the current Maoist revolution is a gesture towards large-scale participation of the Nepali people, who can assert new ways of doing things.

If the current leadership can take credit for the great success of KU, can’t Nepal expect even better leadership with greater participation rather than the elitist, “we know what is best” brand of politics advocated by Professor Wagley? If even USA limits leadership of its President to two terms, or eight years, why should KU be subjected to 17 years under the leadership of the same VC? KU and the system that has been put in place, if really effective, will not only survive but thrive under new leadership and encourage wider participation rather than the narrow elitist politics.
Yelambur, via e-mail


Cover-up attempt
December 12, 2008, The Himalayan Times

This is in reference to the edit page article, “Higher Education: Prachanda’s perspective and realities” (THT, Dec. 8). Though most of the time I admire Dr Mana Prasad Wagley’s write-ups, but his high praise of the management of Kathmandu University (KU) is cosmetic. In the bad name of politics and its intervention, and in the good name of former Indian president Dr. Abdul Kalam and his views, the author has tried to cover up mismanagement and irregularities rampant within KU administration. Moreover, it is difficult to understand which values the writer implies the KU education to be upholding. The values like truth, transparency, equality, rule of law, justice and personnel replacement, which the society cherishes, are miles away from KU. Prachanda extolled KU’s success story but, unlike normal practice, refrained from glorifying KU administration under its present vice-chancellor and his coterie. He knows that KU survives because of the people working at the ground level, e.g. in the classrooms. Likewise, the message from Dr. Kalam is there to absorb and assimilate within oneself first.

Dr. Bibhuti Ranjan Jha, Kathmandu University


Read more!

Monday, December 01, 2008

Kathmandu University In need of rejuvenation

R C Sharma

Magnificent buildings to suit the sloping landscape and picturesque and quaint background of the surrounding hills make Kathmandu University a good place to be around. But when it comes to the real essence of a university, the teachers, the students, the teaching-learning activities, motivation, sense of ownership and dedication, there is some sense of frustration with what is happening at the university. Because of its vicinity to the Kathmandu Valley, apolitical academic environment, timely examination schedules and new courses, it was very popular among the students and guardians, as a suitable alternative to the giant but ailing Tribhuvan University. However, it has failed to maintain its credibility and goodwill.

Most of the key academic and management positions are occupied by the relatives of a chosen few, the vice chancellor, the registrar and the former registrar. Even seventeen years after its establishment, the university has not been able to set up a formal and trustworthy University Service Commission for academic and non-academic appointments. Most of the decisions regarding appointments and promotions are taken on the basis of informal discussions and interviews. Those with close ties with the university top management experience steady career growth and reach to the top echelon rapidly while honest, qualified and dedicated faculty members are forced to work at junior positions for peiods that may go up to almost one and half a decade. In comparison, at Tribhuvan University, we find a set of well defined criteria for appointment or promotion of the teaching staff. Academic qualification, teaching-research experience, national and international publications and presentations and teaching efficiency are very important criteria for selection or promotion among the teaching ranks.

KU has paid the least attention to research activities which are a basis for recognition in the world. There should be a cohesive force to bind the faculty, the management and students together and develop a sense of ownership or a sense of belonging towards the university. Contrary to this, the KU management has has not helped in this effort. For a teacher who is not a relative of any of the top university officials, it is almost impossible to build a secure career. He/she may be denied a promotion, study leave or any other facility because the management does not adhere to any fixed set of rules and regulations. Employee satisfaction is low. Inability to retain qualified teachers in the university service has been the biggest failure of the management which has witnessed a fairly high attrition rate in recent years. Many senior teachers have left the university to pursue better careers and the management is forced to run some of the academic departments with the help of teaching assistants only.

Kathmandu University is considered to be a ‘privately managed public university’. This is rather confusing to many. Actually, it is an educational institution enacted by the parliament and it should be answerable to the people regarding its activities. But, the financial status and the income-expenditure statements of the university have almost been kept as tightly guarded secrets, known to only very few officials of the innermost management core. The KU fees for the students are quite high and it also levies hefty affiliation fees on its medical and management colleges. Besides, it receives aid from the government and other national and international organisations. Much of its investment has gone into the construction of buildings and into supporting the school of medicine which is not self-reliant. Very little expenditure is made on laboratories or research works. Moreover, there have been no welfare programmes for teachers or students. All this leads to questioning the lack of financial transparency. Accusations are there against the VC and his coterie of involvement in unhealthy personal financial interests in the never-ending construction and procurement works at the university. The tendency to occupy a position for successive tenures is common in politics but such trends are rarely seen in academic institutions. Taking maximum advantage of his political contacts and the confidence of the handpicked members of the university senate, Dr. Sharma has been able to continue into the fifth term as VC.

The country is entering a new era of political and social restructuring. In this context it is necessary to strengthen and democratise our educational institutions which for a long time have been political playgrounds and instruments of profit for just a few persons. We are lagging behind in development because our universities have simply churned out theoretically educated but uncompetitive and unskilful graduates. Universities should be hubs of research, invention and development, and they should support the national economy. Kathmandu University desperately needs a change of leadership, to become a dynamic and globally competitive university.

Sharma is a former faculty member, KU
Source: THT


Read more!

Saturday, September 13, 2008

Suresh Raj's new supporter: Dr. Jaya Raj Acharya



After reading "आत्मबल र मनोबलका नमुना" (Example of confidence and moral authority) penned by Dr. Jayaraj Acharya today in Kantipur daily, I am set into thinking. Basically, this piece was to highlight literary achievements and personal crisis of another renowned Nepali Jagadish Ghimire. However, for reasons best known to him, Dr. Acharya has done which majority of us find detestable. In the middle of throwing light on literary and social persona of Jagadish Ghimire, Dr. Acharya has forcefully inserted Suresh Raj's name and started praising him. Moreover, to spray some chilli powder on our wounds, he has even dared to question our credibility. 

Why former representative of Nepal to UN and present boss of Nobel Academy is doing this?

Is it because of his gratitude to Suresh Raj for granting affiliation to Nobel Medical College in which he was one of the promoters? 

Praising Suresh Raj Sharma now is nothing other than praising a criminal who presides over an extremely detestable scheme of harassing someone to death. If one goes by the actions of Suresh Raj, which has caused an irreparable damage to the spirit of KU, praising Suresh Raj is now next to impossible. No sensible human being, be it a student or a teacher or a staff, can ever praise Suresh Raj. Suresh Raj has used goons, tried to divide faculties, defamed faculties who have imparted education to his deceased daughter, vandalized personal dignity of faculties and staffs and ultimately used medieval castiest thought process to harass one dalit member of KU to end his life. This is the reality of KU movement and this is the reality of nefarious personality of Suresh Raj. And our former representative to UN is making his opinions based on some hearsay and claiming that we have not allowed, rather disturbed, "the visionary" to work till the end of his life. 

Dr. Acharya has represented Nepal in UN and is presently heading an academic institution. He has debated for equality amongst developed, developing and underdeveloped nations in UN fora. He has raised issues that deal with emancipation, freedom and liberation. His past actions make us believe that he stands for equality in every walk of human lives. And his past roles make us believe that he would invariably lend his support to the students, teachers and staffs of KU who know the excesses of Suresh Raj and his corrupt and nepotistic academic administration in KU. It is generally expected that a personality involved in a world organization knows the importance of organizational rights and how the organization prevents a rising of despot. But, Dr. Acharya has, this time, preferred to praise Suresh Raj and lamented that we have prevented Suresh Raj to work till death. By penning this piece, Dr. Acharya has not only jettisoned his past credibility but also raised some doubts. 

One thing that we can not miss in this article is Dr. Acharya's lamentations. Concurring with Jagadish Ghimire, he also laments that we are turned into a country where we sell our girls, indulge in gambling and drinking. And to make both the ends meet, we have to ultimately go abroad to earn our livelihood. Dr. Acharaya has , therefore, clearly disliked embarkation of hundreds of youths from Nepal everyday. And he preaches to our political class quoting Kautilya that "राजनीतिले जनताको आर्थिक जीवनमा सुधार ल्याउन सकेन भने त्यो वास्तवमा राजनीति नै होइन, राजनीतिक वेश्यावृत्ति हो "(If politics can not improve economic lives of people, then that is not politics rather a political prostitution). On this point I agree with Dr. Acharya. But, my question to him is what about so called academicians? Can an academician behave as a politician? Should academicians ever go for commercialization of education while creating a wide gulf between haves and have nots? and most importantly, should an academician ever throttle the voice of freedom?

Fans of Suresh Raj can happily criticize politicians of Nepal. Many Nepalis are doing it. So, there is nothing bizarre when Dr. Acharya does it. But, what is weird in his piece is praising of a communal, racists, murderer personality in academia like Suresh Raj as an "engineer of development" in Nepal. Nepal has remained underdeveloped not only because of politicians and kings, but also because of the bootlickers who have been able to penetrate our academia. For example, Suresh Raj has hobnobbed with palace in his early academic life. He became an officer in a school which was set up mainly to educate the king's wards. And once he pleased the palace and the powers there were, he smoothly sailed through his professorship in Tribhuvan University. Dr. Acharya might view Suresh Raj as a good product of TU, but many other personalities including yours truly strongly believe that it a rotten apple set up in academia to impose servitude. And KU movement has definitely validated our opinions about Suresh Raj. 

In a nut shell, after reading Dr. Jaya Raj Acharya, I have come to conclusion that past good actions never make a man good doer for future. Dr. Jaya Raj Acharya's unwarranted praise of Suresh Raj clearly indicates that. Moreover, in view of his being a promoter of Nobel Medical College Biratnagar (Read our previous posting about it here) and the same medical college getting affiliation from Kathmandu University indicates that Dr. Jaya Raj Acharya has tried to pay back the favor. So, Dr. Acharya, notwithstanding his preaching and sermons, is no different from other crooks and supporters of Education Mafia in Nepal. By attacking us, Dr. Jaya Raj Acharya has not only turned himself into a devil's advocate but also sullied his own personal reputation. At last, Dr. Jaya Raj must know that we, including late Buddhi Bahadur, are neither careerists nor unionists. We stand for freedom and equality in academia. Can you hear us?

Further links;


Read more!

Thursday, June 05, 2008

Suresh Raj’s troubles

Suresh Raj Sharma, VC of KU, represents everything that is wrong with Nepal’s education system. In the name of private management, Suresh Raj has a kind of captured Kathmandu University and filled it with dubious people with relations to him and his top cronies. Recently there has been a lull in Nepalis media either because of preoccupation with ongoing political developments or due to somewhat dormant KU movement. But, unknown to the prying eyes of media, developments are fast unfolding in KU. Lobbies are hyperactive to save and to dislodge Suresh Raj Sharma. With the change of guard in the government, it is expected that Suresh Raj will face further pressure to quit and pave the way for non-communal, non-racist, and not corrupt administrator in KU.

Beginning of end
Suresh Raj’s recent travails have started with CA election in Nepal. Though known to be sympathetic with Nepali Congress, Suresh Raj and his entire clan voted for one dubious racist and communal element that helped him to retain his chair in KU. This mass voting by Suresh Raj and Sitaram Adhikary family in Baneswore constituency no. 1 for a racist and communal character would have gone unnoticed but for an overt inaction of one family member of Sitaram who was also in the list of proportional representation of Nepali Congress. Sensing some kind of sabotage, the supporters of FPTP candidate of Nepali Congress kept on monitoring the activities of Suresh Raj and Sitaram and their family members. Much to the chagrin of many congressmen, it had been learnt that entire clan of Suresh Raj and Sitaram asked their relatives and so called supporters to vote for proportional representation only or for the party. This showed that they want to defeat the candidate of Nepali Congress to help their savior win the election while ensuring the election of family member of Sitaram Adhikary. However, the end result was quite different. Their cherished candidate lost the election whereas both the congress party and the congress candidate won by the handsome margin in Kathmandu constituency no. 1.

Despite such sabotage and ugly exhibition of racist and communal attitude, Suresh Raj and Sitaram kept on boasting that they have helped congress win the election in constituency no. 1. They lobbied very hard with corrupt power centers in Nepali congress to put the name of Sitaram’s family member in the proportional list. But, emboldened by thumping victory, the supporters of the candidate of Nepali Congress in constituency no. 1, strongly resisted the nomination of such dubious congressman as CA member. As a result, so called expert on constitution was not nominated by Nepali congress. With this episode, even G.P. Koirala seems to have developed a kind of distaste for Suresh Raj and Sitaram of Kathmandu University. And most importantly, Suresh Raj and Sitaram are exposed threadbare such that their racist, communal and corrupt faces are seen to everyone in Nepali Congress. With this broken link with the power centers in Nepali Congress, Suresh Raj is having lots of tension as he has no body to depend on in case the Maoist government tries to throw him.

Maoists’ involvement in KU
Recent incident of merciless killing of one Maoist sympathizer, Mr. Ram Hari Shrestha, has clearly proved that there are many in the Maoists rank and file who can do anything for money. To save the thieves of their own party, the so called revolutionaries did not hesitate to kill one of their sympathizers. It appears that they wanted to sacrifice one innocent Nepali just to protect some criminals. After this episode, the Maoists have suffered drastic erosion in support base. Moreover, this incident further validates that there are some elements in the Maoists who are hand in glove with Suresh Raj. Past incidents in KU have shown that the Maoists did not take any action against Suresh Raj and Sitaram of KU. The Young Communist League took action against Sitaram Prasain but failed to take action against Sitaram Adhikary of KU. The so called sympathizer of Dalits, oppressed communities and Janjatis was caught sleeping when a dalit member was forced to death in KU. Many in KU strongly believes that YCL and the Maoists would have taken action against Suresh Raj over the harassment triggered death of Late Buddhi Bahadur if they were not hand in glove with Suresh Raj.

As a result, a kind of frustration is growing in KU against the Maoists also. By playing a second fiddle in KU affairs, the Maoists are giving wrong signals. Intellectual members of KU will not hesitate to expose double standards of the Maoists if they keep on ignoring the rot for a long time. Moreover, situation has changed a lot now. Earlier, the Maoists have a kind of constraint due to Girija. But, now when they are going to lead the government themselves, they would have no constraint to purge out the rot in KU.

What should the Maoists do in KU?
The Maoists need to maintain the autonomy of KU. Instead of using KU as a placement office for their cadres, they should focus first on correcting the system from the top. The first thing the Maoists must do in KU is to kick the communal, racist, corrupt, murderer of a member of an oppressed community out. After sacking Suresh Raj Sharma, Sitaram Adhikary and Bhadrman Tuladhar, the Maoists must appoint a probe committee to look into property details of Suresh Raj, Sitaram and Bhadraman. It would be very good if the Maoists nationalizes the properties of all the crooks of Nepal. Similarly, the probe committee must look into the loopholes in KU Service commission to ascertain the dubious manner in which Mukunda, Brijesh, Manish, Daniel, Sarad and many other relatives of Suresh Raj, Sitaram and Bhadraman were appointed. After validating these, the Maoist must sack all these relatives immediately. Things are not as easy as expressed or written. To carry out all these things, the Maoists needs to find out a suitable candidate in consultation with KUPA and KUSA.


Read more!

Sunday, April 27, 2008

Powerful Friendship Kills Professional Ethics

When Kantipur, the most-widely read vernacular daily in Nepal, came in the scene two years after the restoration of democracy in 1990, people had high hopes toward independent media and other democratic institutions. In fact, Kantipur's early success was due its ability to fill the void that the state media had created. People needed to know more than one side of the story, and Kantipur told them without an agenda. That's what I thought what Kantipur was - a newspaper without it's own agenda, a newspaper that "served" the public - until the day when I met the chairman who told me and my friends why his newspaper would not publish the acts of nepotism of the Vice Chancellor of Kathmandu University where I worked. That was the day when I lost hope in Kantipur. This is the same daily that fought so bravely against the corrupt monarchy. It dared to publish articles by an underground Maoist leader for which the editor and two executives were locked up in 2001.

When we met the chairman of Kantipur Publications Pvt. Ltd., we gave him proof of how the VC had blatantly compromised all academic and professional values in the university. We gave him facts about all acts of nepotism, like appointing his brothers, daughter and close relatives in academic and administrative positions. We told him how he influenced the admission, examination and how he virtually controlled everything in the university. Besides his own act of nepotism, we gave sufficient proof of how other administrative heads are directly involved in policy-level corruption. We met the Chairman as members of a newly formed professors' association that was agitating to oust the VC.

(Please remember that the editors of Kantipur told us they cannot publish without the publisher's consent.)

After listening to everything that we had to say, he frankly told us, "The VC is my friend. I have known him for 20 years now. He has asked me not to publish anything against him. What you are saying is true. But I will not publish."

We had nothing to say after that. We did not argue. We did not rationalize. Later, we discussed how a poor country like ours is ruled by a bunch of corrupt people who thrive purely on such collusion.

How can we further the cause of democracy if universities and media don't function transparently? How can media serve the public if they have their own favorite agenda?

Later, we organized a series of protests against nepotism, corruption, and lack of transparency in the institution. We took the case even to the prime minister who heavily favored the VC. It was the biggest revolt in the history of the university. After our visit to the PM's office, one of the technical staff was called by the dean in his office and threatened to fire him if he went against the VC. Three days later, he committed suicide. No media reported it. The regional reporter from Kantipur had sent the story, but it was not published. The newspaper killed the story in favor of the VC. The wife of the deceased gave a testimony to the media that was sufficient to charge the dean with second-degree murder. But, we later heard that she was silenced with a job in a remote area. The media did not report. The media is least interested to go beyond the PR loop that successfully feeds the 'good image' of the VC who has been head of the institution ever since its establishment in 1991.

I think we have to go beyond write-what-you-see model of journalism to find-out-so-that-others-can-see model if we have to serve in the public interest.


Source: (jmcethics)


Read more!

Thursday, April 10, 2008

CA election voting begins in Nepal: violence also starts

Historic CA election is under process today. People, all over Nepal, have shown enthusiastic response to participate in this election.Nepal's electronic media have witnessed high traffic volumes and as a result popular Nepali blog Mysansar has to open up temporary blog Mysansar Tempto divert the visitors' traffic. Similarly, Kantipur online, too is also not loading as smoothly. Please see some photos from MySansar's temporary blog on report of CA election voting. 

1) A voter casting his ballot at 7 am in the morning in Kathmandu (Source:Mysansar)


2) Election official signing on ballot paper in Kathmandu (Source:Mysansar)


In breaking news, Voting stalled in Chitwan, Mahottari, Siraha has reported stalling of election process in some booths in Chitwan, Mahottari and Sarlahi. Reportedly, in Chitwan, violence erupted after Maoist chief Prachanda has already cast his vote. See also; Nepal Maoist chief casts vote in crucial polls

Sudeshana Sarkar has reported that"Violence mars historic Nepal polls". Sarkar's news report mentions of scuffle between Maoists and NC workers in Chitaun and UML and NC workers in Mahottari. Similarly, Lila Koirala has survived gun attack in Dhanusha whereas in hometown of PM G.P. Koirala, police diffused a bomb in a polling booth. In Doramba of Rameshchhap and in Rauthat also, some clashes have erupted between the Maoists and security forces.

After King Gyanendra's communique urging Nepalis to participate in this election peacefully, Nepalis are believing that there would be less violence from his side. However, the incidents in Biratnagar and Dhanusha show that Royalists may try to disturb the polling process as much as possible. Hope innocent Nepalis will not have to loose their lives anymore.


Read more!

Wednesday, April 09, 2008

Vote for Change!



Empty streets of Kathmandu indicates that there is going to take place the biggest celebration in Nepal. Definitely, elections are festivals of democracy as people give their verdicts as real ruler. But, this election of CA, after 6 decades of struggle, is important in that it is the first and last chance to shape up the future of Nepal. Whether to do away with remnants of feudalism or not, whether to bring in republic or not, and whether to defeat tentacles of nepotism, corruption and mafia organizations or not; are the most important issue Nepalis need to contemplate before voting. Wasting such a grand opportunity will never be a prudent move and therefore this blog requests everyone to exercise their voting rights for;

1) defeating feudal remnants of monarchy.

2) turning Nepal into republic. 

3) defeating corrupt politicians

4) defeating politicians known for nepotism.

5) defeating people who support evil satan like Suresh Raj Sharma. 

For this purpose, blurring the party lines, we must elect good/clean people from all the political parties while defeating crooked ones in respective parties. If good politicians are elected from all the political parties, then we can feel that we have voted for change. 

Banner Source: www.kantipuronline.com


Read more!

Monday, April 07, 2008

Academia and casteism


Politics is different from academia. Politicians of South Asia are known for resorting to lies, propaganda and corruption for garnering vote and support. We have a few politicians who willingly sacrifice lucrative positions in favour of steadfast attachment to principle and values. So, in our sphere of world, general impression of politicians is that of a cunning, scheming and greedy person. And to lend credence to public perception, many of these politicians openly defy evolving social code and existing laws and regulations. As if they are the sole creator of rules and regulations, some of them speak, utter, pronounce and propagate ideas in direct contravention of existing rules. Despite similarity in traits of politicians, societal values differ much in respective countries of South Asia. For examples, politicians in Nepal and India are similar in nature. But, prevailing values in Nepal have given our politicians more immunity. Similar comparison can be made between Indian academia and Nepali academia. Though academicians maintain and arouse greater amount of respect over politicians all over the world, yet we are not witnessing the same in Nepal. If one goes by incidents, happenings and events in Kathmandu University, which is also mentioned in our previous blog, situation rather appears worsening. The politician in India, Mr. Mahendra Singh Tikait, was arrested for badmouthing CM of Utter Pradesh using casteist terms. In KU, one academic member mentally tortures another staff to his death, and the harasser is still protected and promoted. So, academia in Nepal, in comparison, looks far worse than unruly politicians of UP and Bihar. 

Is this a good sign for our academia?

Are not our educationist like Suresh Raj Sharma resorting to more dirty politics than Bihari politicians?

Is academician like Suresh Raj capable of holding the prestige of academia higher in Nepal?

Answers to all these questions are definite "No." Not arresting Bhola Thapa for causing death of Buddhi Bahadur Biswokarma, a Dalit employee of KU, has put a big question mark on the notion of fairness in academia. It has shown that our academia is not for justice. In our academia, higher authority can do any thing and can say anything heaping societal disrepute, causing mental agony and setting a life threatening depression on staffs who question their nepotism and highhandedness. To protect their practice of nepotism and to conceal the saga of their corruption, they can do anything. They can invite corrupt sibling to KU premise, excite notorious Mandale to come to university premise with goons and weapons and instruct bootlicking deans, HODs and registrar to exercise their position of power to defame. This is the truth established by Buddhi Bahadur episode in KU. 

It would have been very good if Suresh Raj has also apologised for such an incident in KU. Like Raj Nath Singh of BJP, who at least mentioned that Mahendra Singh Tikait has already apologised for his casteist remarks, Suresh Raj, too, must have asked Bhola Thapa to step down and quit KU. But, Suresh Raj never did anything like this. He rather behaved as criminal politicians of Bihar like Pappu Yadav and Anand Mohan Singh of Bihar. The only difference between these Bihari criminals and Suresh Raj lies in the fact that they are punished for killing rivals and honest District Magistrate, but Suresh Raj is promoted for causing the death of a staff. The way Bhola Thapa is protected, saved and given incentives in Kathmandu University clearly shows that harassment of Late Buddhi Bahadur is a handiwork of KU administration in which designer was Suresh Raj and executioner was Bhola Thapa. Other events of abuse, mental torture, inviting of goons in KU premise, too, clearly point out that "educationist" Suresh Raj has finally revealed his blood-thirsty hunger for power. 

Because of corrupt, murderous academic administration in KU thriving on practice of casteism by Suresh Raj, we are all saddened to see plummeting societal respect for our academia in Nepal. Parents of Dalit and Madhesi students in KU are worried now as they fear that KU officials may mete out similar casteist-communal treatments to their wards. As a result, they are opting for IOE and IOM and other colleges in Kathmandu. Foreign students are now wary to apply for medical schools and engineering schools of KU because they have come to know that programs in KU are mainly programs run for corruption by nepotism. For a self-sustaining institute, this is the most devastating blow. Because of his own design, Suresh Raj has brought such a profound ill-repute for Kathmandu University that KU is now on the verge of loosing both the societal goodwill and international recognition. This will, in long term, definitely precipitate into overwhelming disrecognition of KU. Therefore, it is high time for all, to clearly bear in mind that people like Suresh Raj, with their practices of casteism, is downgrading our academia. 

References:


Read more!

Saturday, April 05, 2008

Casteims, harassment and punitive measures

27 December 2006 is the blackest day in the history of KU. This day one efficient worker, technician and righteous employee of KU ended his life. His wife subsequently claimed that he suffered humiliations at the hands of KU registrar and KU Dean Bhola Thapa. She claimed that he went to meet KU officials demanding organizational rights as he belonged to newly created staff association, Kathmandu University Staff Association (KUSA).However, it has been reported by his wife that, Mr. Buddhi became quite depressed after the meeting. He said,"They would defame me and fire me from KU." Thereafter, he asked his wife to look for an alternative job. When she left him alone in their Banepa residence, Mr. Buddhi hung himself to death. After the news of his death spread and reached KU premises, Dean Bhola Thapa could not muster courage to come to KU. Staffs and faculties were extremely enraged and held one mass meeting on 13th day of his death. Given existing truth surrounding his death, it is now well proven that Dr. Bhola Thapa attacked Mr. Buddhi Bahadur mercilessly setting in him a fatal depression. A dalit employee should have never been harassed like that. But, to crush KU movement at any cost, they did it. In addition to inviting notorious corrupt criminals like Jalan Kumar, and royalist Mayor of Dhulikhel municipality, to thrash a founding member and other staffs, Suresh Raj have even mobilised criminals to harass staffs and faculties mentally.

Harassment triggered death of a KU employee has definitely eroded credibility of Prof. Dr. Suresh Raj Sharma. After KU movement, Suresh Raj is being looked upon as a crook who wants to be VC (Vice-Chancellor) till death at any cost. Many in KU are convinced that had Suresh Raj hot shown such an abhorable greed for power, employess of KU would have never suffered such a traumatic situation. But, in addition to greed and avarice of lowly characters like Suresh Raj, there are some other causes responsible for constant degradtion of academia in KU.

It is worthwhile to say that Nepal still does not have strong punitive provisions against harassment. People can easily use casteist terms agaisnt opponents and humiliate them. Though there exists one legal provision in "Muluki Aina" (Country's rules) against casteism and using casteist terms, yet there are few instance of concrete actions. This is because of both the entrenched social hierarchy and readiness to tolerate insults and humiliations. Now the time has come to adopt some changes. In new Nepal, we can not allow perpetuation of old ideas. Making new Neapl should go hand in hand with legislations and drafting of laws against casteism and harassment. On this count, we can look at Indian constitution and laws and bye-laws there. Recently, leader of Bharatiya Kisan Union, Mahendra Singh Tikait, used some casteist terms against Chief Minister of Utter Pradesh, Ms. Mayawati. Thereafter, state government of UP invoked "SC/ST acts" to arrest Mr. Mahendra Singh Tikait. We need this kind of stringent law in Nepal so that there will be no more harassment triggered deaths in our academia.


Read more!

Tuesday, April 01, 2008

Narahari Acharya starts website




By Paribartan
(paribartan@gmail.com)

It is really very good to see Narahari Acharya starting his website. Amidst clash, intimidation, violence and murder, here comes one politician with positive campaign. Narahari's popularity has been on rise ever since G.P.Koirala accused him of being a royalist agent. Good name of Narahari Acharya, along with that of Gagan Thapa, was dragged through the muck by nepotist Girija just to promote his daughter. Nepotists everywhere behave the same way. Be it in KU or be it in Nepali Congress, they have same strategy. What I admire the most in Narahari Acharya was his throwing gauntlet for presidency of Nepali Congress. He knew very well that G.P. has a very good stronghold in Congress party. Despite his likely defeat, he fought Girija and forced everyone to admire him. Something like this is really missing in our lives. Many of us allow so called powerfuls to get away easily with their mistakes. We say that "OK let him get away at least he has done something and blah blah blah." This is what is deteriorating our polity, academia and society. However big a person is, he should be punished. Rather punishment should be more intense for hot shots so that others will get a precedence not to repeat the same mistake. I think that after Narahari's challenge to him, G.P. Koirala,too, amended his mistake and nominated Mr. Narahari Acharya as central committee member of Nepali congress.

After challenging G.P. Koirala, Narahari has well informed all of us that he is not going to be cowed down by accusations and conspiracies. We need people like him amongst our politicians. Most of our politicians always lick the boot of party president, or party general secretary. Exactly like HODs, Deans, Registrar of KU, who lick the boot of Suresh Raj Sharma to protect their position, many of our ministers, too, line up before the party functionaries. As a result, we do not have upright politicians in Nepal.

Amidst such crisis, emergence of Narahari is really soothing. After his starting very calm dignified campaign in his constitutency, constituency no. 5 in Kathmandu, he has come up with another round of campaign, i.e. to propogate his ideas through his website. Please visit the website to understand, why we need to elect this clean politician.I, too, sincerely believe that CA without some people like Narahari, Gagan, Shankar Pokhrel, Prachanda, Baburam, Yubaraj Gautam will be meaningless. So, crossing across the party line, Nepalis intellectuals need to inform their friends that in this election, which has to decide the fate of 240 years old Monarchy, we need people from an entire spectrum of political parties.


Read more!